太平洋島サミットと日本の原発政策（2）参考資料4 2004－2006
THIRTY-FIFTH PACIFIC ISLANDS FORUM
Apia, Samoa
5 - 7 August 2004
Shipment of Radioactive Materials
30. Leaders reiterated their concerns about possible economic loss in a non-release situation and sought an assurance from shipping States that where there is a demonstrable link between the incident and economic loss Forum countries would not be left to carry such a loss unsupported by the shipping States. Leaders agreed that further work be undertaken on the case for a region-specific Environment Impact Assessment including the extent to which the IAEA and shipping States’ EIAs adequately take account of region-specific dimensions and on any examples of claims being made for rumour-type damage.
THIRTY-SIXTH PACIFIC ISLANDS FORUM
PAPUA NEW GUINEA
25 – 27 OCTOBER 2005
Shipment of Radioactive Materials
29. Leaders reiterated their concerns about the risks of economic loss in an incident involving the shipment of radioactive materials through the Pacific, and restated their view that in the event of losses directly attributable to such an incident, there is an imperative on the shipping states not to leave the countries suffering those losses unsupported. They agreed that the Chair write again to the shipping states in early 2006, taking account of further research on the case for “rumour damage” and the outcomes of the planned International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) regional workshop, and restating the Forum Leaders’ view as outlined above. Leaders noted the IAEA’s response to New Zealand’s informal request for a region-specific Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), and that the Forum Secretariat in consultation with members will consider the implications of that response for the Forum’s EIA proposal.
THIRTY-SEVENTH PACIFIC ISLANDS FORUM
NADI, FIJI
24 – 25 OCTOBER 2006
Shipment of Radioactive Materials
26. Leaders reiterated their concerns about the risks of economic loss in an incident involving the shipment of radioactive materials through the Pacific, and restated their view that in the event of losses directly attributable to such an incident, there was an imperative on the shipping states not to leave the countries suffering those losses unsupported.
